The Hunchback: Folk Horror viewed through Ben Wheatley's Kill List
by Nathan Tyree
“Things only seem
to be magic. There is no real magic. There's no real magic ever.”
-
Martin
When I was a child, I would play with my cousins in the forest
near my home. It was a wonderous place full of shifting light and undiscovered
terrain that opened itself to everything we could dream or imagine. Once we
found a stone fireplace and chimney just setting in a small clearing like an
artefact that had no business being where it was. It was like finding an office
building on the moon. An impossible question. Now, as an adult, I understand
that there had once been a house there. It had been demolished or burned but
that stone chimney survived. Nobody wanted to rebuild and there was no reason
to tear down the last bit, so that fireplace just waited for us to find it.
Then, it was pure magic. The idea of a house never entered
our minds. Instead, we talked of who would have constructed it there. What would
have constructed it there? Were there people, ancient and savage and strange,
living in those woods? Did they light a fire when the moon was full? What sort
of dark ritual drew them? We talked until our own words filled us with terror
and we ran out of the woods and back to my house.
That, at its root, is what FOLK HORROR is. It is the belief that once there was magic and
that that magic was dark, and sharp, and hungry and that even if it is gone
now, it hasn’t gone far.
The standard examples of Folk Horror are The Wicker Man
(1973), Witchfinder General (1968) and Blood on Satan’s Claw (1971), but the
genre has had a major resurgence of late with films like The VVitch, A Field in
England, The Ritual, Gretel and Hansel, Viy, Gaia, In the Earth, They Remain, Midsommar and others. The film I
want to focus on for this piece is Kill List.
Kill List was directed by Ben Wheatley from a script he
co-wrote with Amy Jump. It stars Neil Maskell and Michael Smiley as two
slightly over the hill contract killers preparing for the very cliché ‘one last
job’.
We’ve seen that set-up before. We should probably be tired
of it by now, and yet we keep coming back. We come back because we hope to be
tricked. The reveal we always want is the morally compromised, haggard, tough
guy sacrificing himself for a good cause. Think Creasey in Man on Fire (not to
go down too much of a rabbit trail here, but there is a moment in Tony Scott’s
Man on Fire where Denzel Washington looks at Christopher Walken and asks, “do
you think god will forgive us for the things we’ve done?” and Walken, without a
hint of emotion simply says “no”. That is almost exactly where Maskell and
Smiley are in Kill List, but never mind).
The two (because they need money badly) take a job that
requires that they kill three men. Jay
(Maskell) and Gal (Smiley) seem to have different reasons. Jay’s wife is angry
that he hasn’t worked in eight months and that they money has run out. Gal seems to really like the work.
The first target is a priest. When he sees Jay, there is
recognition and joy on the priest’s face and he humbly thanks Jay for killing
him. This is where we first understand
that this may not be the film we signed up for.
The second target is “The Librarian”. He oversees a
collection of video tapes that are “sickening” and horrible. The exact nature of
the videos is never revealed but given jay’s reaction and the type of person he
is, they must be something more than murder. We assume that they involve
children. The Librarian also thanks Jay,
while being tortured. Jay then beats the man to death with a hammer.
The killers then hunt down associates of the Librarian and
kill them.
The final target is a Member of Parliament. While doing recognizance,
watching the house from the woods that surround it, they witness a strange
ritual which culminates in a human sacrifice.
Jay reacts badly and starts shooting the cultists. He kills the leader
and several others before the remaining few chase Gal and jay into a series of
tunnels. Gal does not survive the
tunnel, but Jay does.
He flees to his family cottage where his wife and son are
waiting.
The Cultists find them there and knock jay unconscious. He
awakes in the woods, wearing a mask. He is attacked by “The Hunchback” and
masked and robed figure, hunched over and misshapen. After a brutal fight, Jay
manages to kill the assailant only to find that it was his wife with their son
strapped to her back. This is a repeat of an early image in the film where Jay
had a pretend sword fight with his wife and child, the boy riding his mother’s
back.
Jay shows no emotion as the cultists place a crown upon his
head.
In Folk Horror, we are accustomed to the outsider being
lured in, think of sergeant Howie (Edward Woodward) in The Wicker Man. Jay is lured, but not to a new place. And not,
as Howie was, to be a sacrifice. Perhaps the closest things we have seen to
this ending are Hereditary, Midsomer, and The VVitch. In all three of those
films the protagonist is elevated and the ending can be viewed as happy, at
least from a very specific point of view. We could, if we stretch, see something
Nietzschean in this tale. Jay has to defeat his own conception of morality (“slave
morality” as good ole Nietzsche would call it) in order to ascend to the point
where he can only be bound by “Master Morality”. To become the Ubermensch . He looked into the abyss, and it not only
looked back, but bade him welcome. He fought monsters to become the monster.
Because it would be unfair not to, here’s Smiley as Tyres is Spaced:
If you came this far, and want to see me talk more about this (in the woods and on the couch) and get a glimpse of my dogs well here it is:
If you like any of this, you can support us on Patreon
Comments
Post a Comment